Narendra Modi’s Legacy on Administrative and Governance Reforms

Beyond the more visible policy announcements and infrastructure projects, Modi’s government has pursued a series of quieter administrative and process reforms aimed at how government itself functions. This article reviews the major changes and how consistently they’ve delivered on their stated goals.

Direct Benefit Transfer

One of the most consequential administrative changes has been the shift toward Direct Benefit Transfer, routing government subsidies and welfare payments directly into beneficiaries’ bank accounts, linked through Aadhaar, India’s biometric identity system, rather than through traditional intermediaries and physical distribution channels. This system, built on the Jan Dhan Yojana bank account expansion covered in our earlier article on that scheme, has been credited by the government with substantially reducing leakage, funds lost to fraud, duplication, or middlemen skimming a share before it reaches intended beneficiaries, across a wide range of welfare programmes, from cooking gas subsidies to pension payments and scholarship disbursements.

Faceless Tax Assessment

The government introduced faceless income tax assessment and appeals starting in 2020, removing direct, in-person interaction between taxpayers and tax officials for most routine assessment and appeal processes, instead using randomised, technology-driven case allocation across different tax jurisdictions. The stated goal was reducing opportunities for corruption and personal bias in tax assessments, a reform government officials have periodically cited as part of a broader “trust-based governance” approach to regulatory interaction with citizens and businesses.

Also read: How Modi Reshaped Hindutva Politics Within Mainstream Governance

The Jan Vishwas Act and Decriminalisation

A more recent and still-evolving reform thread involves decriminalising a wide range of minor regulatory and compliance offences that had previously carried criminal penalties, replacing them with civil financial penalties instead. The Jan Vishwas Act, passed in 2023, and further amendments considered in subsequent years, according to PRS Legislative Research’s tracking of the bill, aim to reduce the compliance burden on ordinary businesses and citizens for minor, often technical violations that critics argued had disproportionately empowered lower-level officials to harass compliant businesses over trivial infractions, part of what the government has termed a broader shift toward “trust-based governance,” according to a piece published by the Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation specifically framing the legislation in these terms.

Ease of Doing Business Reforms

Beyond the internationally tracked Ease of Doing Business index itself, covered in our earlier article on India’s global rankings, the underlying domestic reforms behind that now-discontinued index included simplifying business registration processes, reducing the number of permits and licenses required for common business activities, and digitising various regulatory filings, changes that, independent of the index’s own later credibility problems, represented genuine simplification of processes that businesses had long identified as bureaucratic friction points.

The GST Council as an Administrative Innovation

Beyond its tax-policy function covered in our earlier articles on GST, the GST Council itself represents a notable administrative innovation: a permanent, constitutionally mandated body bringing central and state finance ministers together for recurring, structured decision-making on a shared area of policy, a governance mechanism without much precedent in India’s earlier federal administrative structure, whatever the separate debates about its centralising effects on state fiscal autonomy covered in our article on Modi’s federalism impact.

Read this next: Aadhaar-Based Governance: How Modi Used Aadhaar for Reform

Where These Reforms Have Faced Criticism

Not every administrative reform has delivered cleanly on its stated goals. Digitisation and faceless processes, while reducing opportunities for certain kinds of direct corruption, have in some cases introduced new friction for citizens with limited digital literacy or unreliable internet access, particularly in rural areas, a criticism raised periodically by opposition politicians and civil society groups regarding various DBT and digital governance rollouts. Implementation gaps between announced reforms and their actual on-the-ground delivery have also been a recurring theme, with several government schemes facing documented delays or uneven state-level rollout despite ambitious national announcements.

How These Reforms Fit Together as a System

Taken as a whole, these administrative changes represent a coherent, if incomplete, philosophy of governance reform: reducing direct human discretion at points of interaction between citizens or businesses and the state, whether through algorithm-driven tax case allocation, direct digital transfer of welfare payments bypassing physical intermediaries, or converting minor criminal liability into straightforward civil penalties, all aimed at the same underlying goal of narrowing opportunities for corruption or arbitrary official power at the individual transaction level, even where each specific reform’s on-the-ground effectiveness remains a separately debated question.

Bottom Line

Modi’s administrative and governance reform record includes genuine structural changes, Direct Benefit Transfer’s reduction of welfare leakage, faceless tax assessment, and the Jan Vishwas Act’s decriminalisation push among them, changes aimed broadly at reducing corruption opportunities and bureaucratic friction, even as digitisation-dependent reforms have introduced their own access challenges for citizens with limited digital connectivity, a trade-off worth weighing alongside the reforms’ more straightforwardly positive efficiency gains.

FAQ

Abhyudaya Verma